The hypothesis of a postpositional compensatory lengthening (van Wijk’s law) vs. a relative chronology of Common Slavic

The appropriate place to share useful online or printed resources about every aspect of Indo-European studies and proto-language reconstructions, including your own works and websites regarding (Proto-)Indo-European language, dialects, society, culture, etc..
Post Reply
cquiles
Posts: 241
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:31 am
Contact:

The hypothesis of a postpositional compensatory lengthening (van Wijk’s law) vs. a relative chronology of Common Slavic

Post by cquiles » Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:04 pm

The hypothesis of a postpositional compensatory lengthening (so-called van Wijk’s law) vs. the relative chronology of Common Slavic phonologi­cal devel­opments – in search of inconsistencies, by Zbigniew Babik, Baltistica (2017) 52(2)

Abstract:
“Van Wijk’s law” is currently defined by its advocates as a lengthening of short or shortened medial and final vowels due to an assimilation of the postconsonantal *j to them. In the present paper I am trying to demonstrate that this assumption is at variance with the relative chronology of Slavic, according to which the loss of yod after liquids and nasals must be dated before the rise of new timbre distinctions and before the shortening of final long vowels.
Carlos Quiles - Academia Prisca

Post Reply