“How useful is case morphology?”: from Latin to French: Continuités et ruptures

The appropriate place to share useful online or printed resources about every aspect of Indo-European studies and proto-language reconstructions, including your own works and websites regarding (Proto-)Indo-European language, dialects, society, culture, etc..
Post Reply
cquiles
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:31 am
Contact:

“How useful is case morphology?”: from Latin to French: Continuités et ruptures

Post by cquiles » Sat Apr 21, 2018 7:33 am

“How useful is case morphology?”: from Latin to French: Continuités et ruptures, by Lene Schøsler. DOI: 10.1515/9783110551716-008, In: Latin Tardif - Français Ancien: Continuités et Ruptures, edited by Anne Carlier, Celine Guillot-Barbance, De Gruyter 2018.

Read it at Google Books

On the same interesting topic:

How useful is case morphology? The loss of the Old French two-case system within a theory of Preferred Argument structure, by Ulrich Detges, In: The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal and Shobhana L. Chelliah [Studies in Language Companion Series 108] 2009, pp. 93–120.

Abstract:
This paper discusses the loss of the Old French two-case system within the theory of Preferred Argument Structure (Du Bois 2003, 1987). It will be shown that the chronology of this process followed a hierarchy of relative frequency, which in turn was driven by discourse preferences. Apart from strictly historical facts, this explanation also accounts for some basic typological properties of case-marking systems. In particular, it will be argued that no correlation exists between morphological case marking on the one hand and word-order flexibility on the other. Moreover, the theory of Preferred Argument Structure allows for a coherent assessment of the long-standing observation that in many cases, morphological case on full nouns is not necessary for distinguishing subjects from non-subjects.
Carlos Quiles - Academia Prisca

Post Reply